The Spanish luxury fashion house Balenciaga last advertising campaign went too contrevantial due to featuring children cuddling teddy bears in bondage gear.
Nevertheless, beside the objectification of children in other campaign featuring ”Adidas” they have posted a post in which it embodies a page from 2008 SCOTUS United States v. Williams; advertising child pornography as a federal crime not protected by free speech. As well, in another post with the French actress ” Isabelle Huppert” includes in the background a ”Michael Borremans” book, whereby the Belgian artist’s work features bare children …….
THE BRAND’S REACTION OVER THE BACKLASH
The brand apologized and deleted their Twitter account and their posts on Instagram, along with suing the set designer and the production company for $25M.
I do feel really sorry for these kids and pretty disgusted of Balenciaga and the parents of these kids for putting their children in such a situation…Personally, I don’t believe Balenciaga’s regret or apologizes because I do trust the idea that they are well aware of the minimum details… Thus, what’s y’all perspectives about this case?
So i hope y’all enjoyed it. Don’t forget to share y’all thoughts with us down below// Take Care//